mgid.com, 766271, DIRECT, d4c29acad76ce94f

The physical control letter from Limo Village for PT mbm does not have a number. Because it is a regular letter.


Tangerang, internasionalpos.com

The trial of the Limo Village Land case that dragged Carly Candra who claimed to be the heir of the Nio land, the prosecutor presented 3 witnesses, the Head of Limo Village Satria and the Head of Teluk Naga Sub-district Zaza Manohara.

While one witness left the Tangerang District Court building before being questioned. Information still obtained by the media crew, the witness was afraid of the masses of the defendant Carly Candra.

In his testimony, the Head of Limo Village, Satria, a native of Limo Village, was born in 1990. He knew the problematic land after.

Becoming the Village Head, did not know who the owner was. Knowing Carly who claimed to be the new land owner in the courtroom today, Friday, July 4, 2025, Satria emphasized before the panel of judges Muhammad Asri Usup, Public Prosecutor Cipto, the Banten High Prosecutor’s Office. And 15 of Carly’s lawyers.

Witness Satria answered the question of the panel of judges Muhammad Afri, “I don’t know the defendant.

He became the village head from December 2019 to 2027. Satria admitted that he did not know the problem. He knew he was called by the Banten Police.

Regarding certificate no. 05 of Limo Village. I answered that it was my knowledge, Your Honor.

Although I am originally from Limo Village, I don’t know much about the defendant’s land problems, said Satria.

To clarify, Public Prosecutor Cipto read the BAP of witness Satria when he was questioned by the Banten Police. Satria confirmed that the letter was made and it was not registered in the name of PT mbm.

Witness Satria never came to the letter but was a staff.

When the defendant’s attorney fished for witness Satria’s statement, who made the Village staff when you became Village staff when the witness was still a Village staff.

Satria was a little confused by the trapping question, not sir.

The one who made and signed the Village staff, I have become the Village Head, not every Village, Satria answered sharply.

“I don’t know the Land Owner in the village that is now a problem,” don’t know”, said Satria.

“While the physical land is controlled by PT MBM, PT MBM, Physical control only”, said Satria.

When asked about the ownership and letters owned by the defendant and PT MBM.

“For physical control, PT MBM has an AJB”, said Satria, The basis for the landing of the physical control AJB was issued in the name of PT MBM. Shm 005 Limo in the name of Candra, the witness did not know.

The physical control document issued by the village head was made by staff and signed by village staff.

The physical control letter after the letter was made by the village.

According to the witness, the village head, Satria, the land was previously an empty pond.

“I know I often pass by the land, but I don’t know who the owner is,” said the village head in response to the questions from the defendant Satria’s legal advisor.

PBB is paid directly to the tax authority. Can be directly through the bank. In this case, the witness Kades Limo confirmed the defendant’s lawyer’s question when questioned by the police in the BAP 2 times questioned by the investigator.

PT MBM when submitting a land control application did not include a certificate only AJB

The letter of control from the Village was not given a registration number Forgot sir. Submitting a land control application PT MBM did not attach a PBB land payment letter. AJB letter is enough.

Issuance of a regular control letter, so it was not given a register. The land has been certified in someone else’s name.

Suddenly someone else asked for a letter to the Village asking for a land control letter Not allowed to answer Kades Satria, Answering questions from the defendant’s legal advisor.

The letter that was forged by the defendant Carly Chandra was only AJB. While AJB 02 the witness did not know about the sale and purchase.

The physical control letter for the land by Nono was perfect in Limo Village who submitted a physical control letter.

Defendant Carly Chandra’s question criticized witness Satria, the Head of Limo Village. Defendant Charli Chandra physical control letter because PT. MBM wanted to physically control the land.

Power of attorney no. 11 of 2015 SHM 05 Limo Village in the name of Sumita Chandra, Land registered in the name of another person.

The village head still issued a physical control letter, If it is disputed to civil or criminal law.

“Satriya answered that it was the applicant’s business, Not the village head’s business even though, Issuing a physical control letter because there was a request from the applicant Nono Sampurno with evidence of AJB replied”, Satria weakened the defendant’s question.

Meanwhile, the head of Teluk Naga sub-district Zamzam Manohara in front of the panel. Judge Teluk Naga sub-district office moved 2X which is now in 2019. Deed of sale and purchase 202 month 3 .. Register AJB 202 year 2002. is in the regiater recorded in the name of Petit as the buyer.

“Recording at the sub-district continues according to the serial number when asked for evidence of the letter, the sub-district head Manohara did not bring it, sir”, said the panel of judges immediately taking over the answer of the defendant’s attorney by showing evidence in the case file.

Shown evidence, the sub-district head’s witness confirmed it before the public prosecutor, the defendant and the defendant’s lawyer.

Ajb first then Sub-district Register, Seller than okay nyu. Seller chairul Wijaya. Criminal verdict 96 Paul Chandra as the defendant.

“Witness Sub-district Head Manohara did not know, Number 202 Sub-district registration”, said.

(play)

Berita Terkait

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Top