The alleged irregularities in the making of the certificates were there was no land history.

Tangaerang, internasionalpos.com

The follow-up trial of the land grabbing case with a PRONA certificate is heating up, Land purchased in 1995 from Damhuri based on disgrace, Object of the Case was previously a garden planted with cassava, Monday (19/05).

Sale and Purchase of Samsimar. The late to Damhuri 1 plot no. 11. The land was entrusted to the late Inda.

Not controlled by Samsinah. Since the purchase in 1995 the land has never been. Controlled by Samsinah.

Samsimar died in 2003, his child Nana Nur Ramadhani was still small. In 2022, witness Amin was given a mandate to see the letter. The letter was held by witness Amin but the person was in Padang Pariaman.

Pahroji, a Mekar Sari villager, said that the land had become 3 certificates for the 2019 PTSL program.

The certificates in the names of Amiruddin, Sawin, Entih, when mediating at the village office, Amiruddin wanted to replace 50 million instead of losing his house.

The landowner’s request was 100 million. Amiruddin ran away for more than a year and could not be contacted and his cellphone number was lost. His business also moved, said witness Amin. Sawin, son of the late Inda.

At the end of 2022, Sawin brought an NGO. The decision was that Sawin would hand over the house and be given compensation of 45 million.

It has been completed and the certificate has been handed over, while Entih, Sawin’s sister, the daughter of the late Enda, did not want to hand over her land until it became a lawsuit.

The total land area is 178m2. Amir 50m2 Sawin 84, the rest 45 and Intih The land is still empty.

Land built in August 2023 by Enti The reason Enti’s 45-meter land can be purchased from Ali Nasir, the husband of the late Samsimar, is always the plaintiff from his son as the heir of Nana Nur Rahmadani.

“Endah, Enti’s parents and Sawin admitted that they could buy it from Ali Nasir. When investigated, the signatures were different from Ali Nasir’s,” said witness Amin

There was a conspiracy between the Klurah officials and Mr. Enda, said the witness before the panel of judges at the Tangerang District Court, Monday, May 19, 2025.

Sarjaman, the witness said. The location of the land in Mekar Sari Village, Rajeg, Luhut Village, 179 square meters. Above the object of the case is a house. The land belongs to the late Samsimar, the object.

The 1995 case was a cassava plantation, there were also jackfruit trees, said witness Sarjaman. The land was never controlled until he died.

The joint agreement letter with Sawin has been. Providing a certificate and handing over 84 meters of land. The land has a house owned by Sawin.

The agreement has been given a 45 million Kerohiman money. Currently the house is empty.

The sale and purchase agreement has scribbles and a different signature from Ali Nasir. Enti gets the remaining 45 meters of land.

Defendant 1 Amiruddin wants to replace the 50 million land money from the village pahroji. Ramadani is the heir of the late Samsinar’s son. PBB belongs to Enda when he was a BPN person.

Measuring the land owned by Samsinar is recognized as still his land. The 1995 land was never taken care of and neglected until the certificate of defendant 1 Armin Rudin, and Entih, while the head of Mekar Sari Village, defendant 3, never attended the civil lawsuit trial. Likewise, the BPN always co-defendants also missed the trial.

Position of the land in question. Road boundary. Behind it is irrigation. On the right is Indah bin Lilah, on the left is Hasan.

Plot land and customary land. The purchase of land between Samsimar and Ali Nasir’s husband had a dispute, because Ali Nasir did not agree while Samsimar bought it using his own money, said witness Amin

The plaintiff’s attorney Achmad Tajuddin sh said there were many irregularities related to the issuance of certificates belonging to defendants 1 and 2.

The alleged irregularities in the making of the certificates were there was no land history.

The alleged making of the prime certificate did not meet the requirements such as ajb, we’ll just see the next trial, said the attorney for the plaintiff’s heirs.

(arfaiz)